Debtors’ prisons were supposed to have gone out with the 19th century, but there is evidence that they still exist today in the United States.
November 6, 2017
By: Bobby Casey, Managing Director GWP
Do an internet search on debtors’ prisons, and the top searches will take you back to 19th century Western Europe. Search something like “debtors’ prison United States” and you will find something disturbingly different: multiple stories of the country’s poor rotting away in jails over fees and fines they had no chance of being able to pay.
Here’s how Wikipedia defines them:
“Destitute persons unable to pay a court-ordered judgment would be sentenced to these prisons until they had worked off their debt via labor or secured outside funds to pay the balance; the product of their labor went towards both the costs of their incarceration and their accrued debt.”
We don’t hear the term much, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Similarly, you don’t hear the term ransom being used much, and yet that’s exactly what bail is. So, the abandonment of a term doesn’t mean society has necessarily abandoned a practice.
The political class uses the middle class for revenue, but it builds its careers on the backs of the poor. Think about it, if the city needs funding, it hits up the middle classman with a few $35 traffic tickets. They reluctantly pay it, so as to move on with their daily grind. The poor aren’t as quick with the cash, but they are a great target for “cracking down on crime” or “populist organizing”. Either way, the politically ambitious LOVE the career opportunities the poor unwittingly offer.
Lately, there’s been an up-tick in the amount of poor being hit with fines they can’t afford for acts that don’t warrant such a penalty in the first place.
Let’s go back to the $35 traffic ticket. You might poo-poo a ticket that small. In fact, you might even be able to argue that a poor person should be able to afford to pay it.
It’s not just the $35 for the ticket, however. It’s $35 PLUS other fees. What other fees? Well, in the state of California, for example, there is a 20% state surcharge. Then another at the county level. Then court fees. All in, your $35 ticket can cost you up to $146 out the door. I haven’t seen a $35 moving violation ticket in years… I have seen signs for $271 fines just for using the HOV lanes without the required number of passengers in it. If that equation holds, then imagine what a $271 ticket would amount to when all was said and done.
If you can’t make the payment, you pay for your own incarceration. If you aren’t incarcerated, you often pay for a private parole service until you’re paid up (as is the case in Mississippi).
I’m all for privatization. But I’m very much against fascism. Fascism is basically socialism with a privatized façade. So the Federal Reserve or Freddie Mac are examples of fascistic entities whereby the business is “privately held”, but their only customer is the government.
So everything from private prisons to private parole officers are fascistic in that they ONLY have government contracts, and their demand is solely found in the public sector by fiat.
The bigger issue is, much like civil asset forfeiture is considered “policing for profit”, these debtors’ prisons are prisons and parole for profit. The more laws and penalties there are, the more profitable these enterprises are. They are profitable and wind up funding those who run for public office that have their best interests at heart.
There’s no incentive to eliminate the war on drugs or leave victimless offenders alone. There becomes a state contrived incentive to harass the public and shake them down for just about anything.
Here are some real examples:
- Kevin Thompson of DeKalb County, Georgia, a 19 year old mechanic, and was cited for speeding and an expired license. Unable to pay the $810 fines, he was assigned 30 days of probation with Judicial Correction Services, Inc.
“Thompson met with his parole officer from JCS weekly and made payments totaling $85, most of which he borrowed because he was unemployed. JCS kept $30 of those payments as a fee, so that amount didn’t count toward the total owed. Eventually, Thompson told his probation officer that he was unable to pay, and she informed him that he would have to appear before a judge to have his parole revoked. He ended up in a jail cell for owing $838 in fines and fees.”
- Another case involving Judicial Correction Services, Inc. comes out of Mississippi. 54 year old Joseph Anderson – a man with severe health problems, no prior criminal activity, and living well below the poverty line – was cited for speeding. What started off as a $170 fine quickly blew up to $580 because he couldn’t afford to pay the initial costs. He was assigned to JCS where he was supposed to pay a $10 set-up charge and $40 per month in supervision fees. He managed about half that, which was met with an arrest and incarceration.
- Qiana Williams of St. Louis, Missouri, spent over 4 months in jail for a series of unpaid parking tickets, driving without a license, and minor traffic violations. She has missed being with her child on major holidays simply because she couldn’t afford to pay the fines or fees. Perhaps one might argue that if she just kept current with her license or didn’t break the speed laws, this wouldn’t be a problem. But if the city literally profits from its constituents’ slip-ups, then she never stood a chance.
As The Atlantic explains: “What these cities lack in tax receipts, they collect through fines and fees stemming from minor municipal violations. These include vehicle violations such as expired registration, speeding, or seat-belt tickets, and other offenses like ‘saggy pants’ or property-upkeep tickets (everything from chipped paint to trash-can violations).”
The argument is that these services are funded by the offenders themselves. But are they? I mean, they have no money. That’s why they are there. If it was successfully FUNDED they wouldn’t be sitting in a cell.
If the purpose of law is to keep order, and the purpose of government is to maintain a civilized society, why is there no example of such virtue being set by these governments? This isn’t about safety, civility, or order. It’s about control and funding. Is this what happens when the beast is starved? It just shakes the villagers down until it gets some loose change?
Debtors’ prisons were abolished for a reason: they were wrong. They are still wrong. The regression back to employing such a tactic shows how desperate the political class are for power, control, and revenue. If these are the lengths governments are willing to go through to bleed a stone, then make no mistake: no one is immune. It might start with the poor, but it doesn’t stop with them. If speeding was really a $35 offense, then it would be $35 everywhere. But it’s not. It’s whatever the government in that particular area believes it can extract from you… and it’s never a comfortable amount.
Click here to schedule a consultation to learn how to protect your assets, or here to become a member of our Insider program where you are eligible for free consultations, deep discounts on corporate and trust services, plus a wealth of information on internationalizing your business, wealth and life.
One Response
Thanks for the good writeup. It in truth used to be a enjoyment account it.
Look complex to more introduced agreeable from you! However, how can we
keep up a correspondence?