FBI & IRS Rifling Through Your Virtual Communications?

April 12, 2013

By: Kelly Diamond, Editor

What is “reasonable” for government agents, usually is quite UNreasonable to the private citizen, especially when it comes to privacy of our virtual communications!

FBI & IRS Rifling Through Your Virtual CommunicationsI keep hearing the word “reasonable” from government agencies!  In the words of the great Inigo Montoya (h/t “The Princess Bride”), “You keep saying that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means.”  Earlier this week, a member of the Obama administration opined on what a “reasonable” amount of retirement savings should be.  Now we’ve got FBI and IRS agents providing their input on what constitutes a “reasonable” expectation of privacy.

Not surprisingly, the FBI and IRS don’t think we HAVE a reasonable expectation of privacy when it comes to our virtual communications.  (Feel free to take a moment to recuperate from the shock.)  Laws currently exist on the books which are meant to prevent “illegal searches and seizures”.  We have the Fourth Amendment, for example: 

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Evidently you have a reasonable expectation of privacy in only the things the government doesn’t want to look into.  If someone hacked my email account, that would be considered a crime.  When “Anonymous” hacked government accounts, that was an act of “cyber terrorism”.  But when the government hacks OUR accounts to read our emails that’s to be expected… in fact, it’s reasonable?  In 1986, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act passed, allowing federal agents to access up to 180 days’ worth of archived emails WITHOUT a warrant.

In 2008, the US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in US v Warshak that no-warrant searches of emails was in fact a violation of the Fourth Amendment.  Since then, activist groups of all political stripes – liberal, conservative, libertarian – as well as prominent businesses like Amazon, Apple, AT&T, eBay, Google, Intel, Microsoft, and Twitter, have advocated for the ECPA to be updated and require probable cause and search warrants. 

However, there is no way to know if the IRS has sought a warrant for every email account it accessed after the Warshak ruling.  The information gathered and found by the ACLU indicates the searches continued, but the warrants were not obtained in every case.  In fact, in an IRS handbook released in 2011, it still insists a warrant is not necessary to obtain email archives less than 180 days old.

The FBI is up against some legal restraints as well in its efforts to access and seize information in people’s private virtual accounts.  The Communictions Assistance for Law Enforcement Act allows federal agencies to compel internet and phone providers to install surveillance equipment in their networks.  It does not, however, cover email, cloud services or online chat services like Skype.  Moreover, it does nothing to help them with real-time communications via Dropbox, Google Voice, or online gaming. 

Under Title III of the Wiretap Act, agents can ask online email and chat providers to provide “technical assistance necessary to accomplish the interception”.  The FBI finds this troublesome because they want authority to force them to “effectuate” real-time surveillance… technical assistance is insufficient in helping them keep up with real-time exchanges and communications.  Google, for example uses SSL Encryption which requires the feds to seek access from Google.  According to FBI General Council, Andrew Weissman, it is the priority of the Bureau to get more surveillance authority (read: enhance its spy powers).

The mentality of the federal agencies is similar to someone who says, “Locking the door to your house, still means anyone can come in.”  As if virtually locking my online communications with password level protection fails to indicate or adequately communicate to the general public and government that I want my information left alone? 

Evidently our information is at as much risk as our wealth!   Here at Global Wealth Protection, we offer information and encourage our subscribers and readers to globalize their assets to safeguard them against the thieving hands of government and litigious gold-diggers.  It stands to reason that we would be affiliated with the folks at Cryptohippie.

Their services provide the utmost in privacy, maintaining your anonymity by passing everything through at least two national jurisdictions and not operating out of any US based networks.  In fact, they only serve as authenticators to a network, but have no involvement in the operation of that network.  That disconnect between network services and your account information along with your activities allows Cryptohippie to simply facilitate military grade encryption and privacy for its customers.

While some folks are looking to and waiting on laws and lawmakers to protect their rights and privacy, the free market has stepped up to the plate once again to deliver where governments fail.  It also appears that the laws are being written to make these searches somehow allowable, while the market answers the pleas of what people really want: privacy and to be left alone.  Perhaps I romanticize free-market capitalism a bit, but I find a certain amount of heroism in the fact that the market exemplifies the benefits of decentralization.  Whether it’s decentralized currency, or decentralized VPNs, or globalized assets… it the central planners and their agencies flummoxed, but leaves you, the private citizen, protected.

Opt In Image
Free Asset Protection Newsletter
Weekly Privacy and Prosperity Tips

Enter your email address to receive our Asset Protection e-newsletter with tips and ideas you can use to keep you, your family and your assets safe. We never sell, rent or share our email lists, and you may opt out at any time.

Sign up today and get your free Geo-Arbitrage Report with practical, hands-on tips for taking back what is rightfully yours - your freedom and your privacy.

Comments

  1. Kevin Beck says

    My corollary to this line of thinking is: There has not been any good legislation created since 1792, when the Bill of Rights was adopted as part of the Constitution. And there have been darn few Executive Orders since then that have made lives better than they were before.

    Which goes to show you that, from the first session of Congress, things have gone progressively downhill.

  2. Christian says

    Bravo, you have the best commentaries !

    With an extra 10,000 IRS agents on the payroll, who in their right mind doesn’t think that we are all being watched & audited. Soon it will be an act of treason just to talk this way. After all , the only time you want privacy is when you are trying to hide something,… right. Well that’s the logic of this new world that this and other big brothers are creating.. Also everything belongs to the government, even after its paid for, let’s face it, no-one owns anything, Everything is taxed, Don’t pay your taxes, they take it away, and sell it to pay back taxes. Or if you have a valuable piece of property, and they want it, they can take it away through imminent domain, and use it or sell it to a developer. Lets face it, this is not the country & came to 40 years ago !

    Are you saying that your servers, and records are not in the US, and out of the long reach of the US & IRS ?

    If so then one would need to use a separate encrypted website in order keep unwanted eyes & ears away from our emails, is that correct ?

    As always it is a pleasure,
    Christian

    • Kelly Diamond says

      The reality is, when your assets are transparent to the government, they are not really yours. Example: your home. You hold the title. You hold the mortgage. You pay off the debt, but you still have to pay property tax or “state rent” to the state! if you don’t, you lose your house! Same goes with income and capital gains. Same goes for your point with imminent domain. This idea that there are “legal” grounds upon which the state can confiscate your property is crazy… but what really stinks is that they can take your property if you don’t pay the extortion fees they demand in the first place! ARGH!

Speak Your Mind

*

Read previous post:
Bank & Government Betray Trust, Begets Disincentive to Save

April 10, 2013 By: Kelly Diamond, Editor Private account holders should seek safe havens that will actually keep their information...

Close