ObamaCare and the Republican Failure to Repeal | Global Wealth Protection

ObamaCare and the Republican Failure to Repeal

Republicans fail to deliver on the primary promise they made to the voters: Repealing ObamaCare. The cost of that failure will fall squarely on the shoulders of taxpayers.

August 14, 2017

By: Bobby Casey, Managing Director GWP

repeal obamacare republican failureThe ONE issue that got Republicans elected was the promise of repealing ObamaCare; and that turned out to be a monumental failure.

Congress members went from an overture of anti-ACA rhetoric and promises of rescue, to equivocating on the finer points of the proposed bill, to ultimately failing to pull through.

Seven senators broke from the party, and voted against a straight repeal: Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.; Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; Dean Heller, R-Nev.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; and Rob Portman, R-Ohio.

And perhaps their selling out on this is best explained below:

Federal policies that increase coverage increase the amount of money flowing to special interests. Federal policies that decrease coverage mean more money for private households. No wonder both ObamaCare supporters and ObamaCare reformers evaluate proposed changes on whether they increase or decrease coverage.” (Source: The Hill)

This observation reminds us all to FOLLOW THE MONEY! And indeed this boondoggle was never about helping the indigent and sick. If it was, it wouldn’t be creating more indigent and sick! It was about sucking money out of the private sector, and financially crippling it out of choices.

The ACA was and remains a horrible idea and an even worse policy in practice. We’ve followed this issue closely because it has put the squeeze on businesses of all sizes and subsequently the US economy as a whole.

Premiums are continuing to rise. That’s due in part to all the various things health insurance is mandated to cover. The mandates aren’t just on the individuals. They are also on the insurance companies. But most Americans don’t need or want that level of coverage.

So people dropped out, which means less healthy people and money in the risk pool. Couple that with high liabilities within the risk pool due to the preexisting conditions and other mandatory coverage, and you have higher premiums, and higher deductibles.

Insurance companies offer higher deductibles so as to keep the premiums lower… but there is a point of diminishing return here. At some point it makes no sense to have anything more than catastrophic insurance and nothing else. The deductible is so high, you’re better off with a Health Savings Plan.

In 2016, 6 million Americans decided to pay the penalty rather than buy insurance. If the mandate were lifted, another 15 million would opt out of insurance at the current rates.

Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini said that ObamaCare was only ‘getting worse’ because there weren’t enough young, healthy enrollees to pay for the sick people covered by the ObamaCare exchanges. Bertolini said it was due to ‘how poorly structured the funding mechanism and premium model is,’ as premiums keep increasing with the death spiral, causing less people to sign up, and thus resulting in even higher premiums.”

Here’s the real kicker: for as much as liberals complain about the low wages across the US and the unaffordable cost of living, ObamaCare has stymied wage growth. With most of insurance being provided by employers, as premiums rise, employers are less likely to extend pay increases to their employees when they are mandated to make pay increases to insurance companies instead.

What happens when that becomes too much, and employers opt for the penalties rather than pay the premiums for their employees, as many individuals have clearly already done?

Congressional Budget Office estimates that the number of uninsured will increase to 26-28 million over the next ten years as more employers opt to stop offering insurance plans.”

The original problem, prior to ACA, was about 15% of Americans had no insurance. But it wasn’t necessarily because they couldn’t afford it. Some didn’t see the point in paying for it because it wasn’t very cost effective for the lack of medical needs they had. It made more sense to pay out of pocket.

By 2018, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that ObamaCare will spend $63 billion on insurance subsidies for 10 million people.”

The problem with that is 8 million of those aforementioned people had coverage before the ACA was enacted.

This law has saddled the United States’ economy with unsustainable economic hardship. This is why of the 23 exchanges that were created at the inception of this bill, 15 of them have since shut down. There is little to no choice in many states for ACA exchange policies. States can’t manage their new found Medicaid burdens.

There was already an impending primary care doctor shortage in the United States, but that was accelerated by the ACA. The shortage of doctors overall, are now leading to longer wait times in emergency rooms.

All the problems with healthcare that the ACA was supposed to address and fix, it exacerbated and expanded. And Americans are stuck with it until a sufficient amount of sense can come together in the halls of congress. I advise NOT holding your breath.  It might be faster, in fact, to seek residency in another country!

The ACA is a failure at its stated purpose, as is the Republican Party. But failure always comes with a cost, and that cost is going to be passed down to the taxpayer. As J.T. Young observes:

ObamaCare shows what occurs when government tries to enforce a market. By applying subsidies to one or both sides of the economic equation, its enforced market cannot exist without continued government subsidies in the short-term, and becomes unsustainable in the long-term as politics compounds subsidies’ distortion.”

The idea that the opposition to ObamaCare is somehow “cold-hearted”, “cruel”, or “uncaring” is such a distorted assessment of the entire healthcare issue in the United States. If any solution entails that those who once did not suffer should now suffer, then I want nothing to do with it. That rearranging a problem; not solving one.

For as “anti-establishment” as Trump was made out to be, America is really in for just more of the same. More of the same brutal foreign policy and interventionism; more of the same ObamaCare “death spiral”.

Click here to schedule a consultation or here to become a member of our Insider program where you are eligible for free consultations, deep discounts on corporate and trust services, plus a wealth of information on internationalizing your business, wealth and life.

Opt In Image
Free Asset Protection Newsletter
Weekly Privacy and Prosperity Tips

Enter your email address to receive our Asset Protection e-newsletter with tips and ideas you can use to keep you, your family and your assets safe. We never sell, rent or share our email lists, and you may opt out at any time.

Sign up today and get your free Geo-Arbitrage Report with practical, hands-on tips for taking back what is rightfully yours - your freedom and your privacy.

Comments

  1. Kevin Beck says:

    You can’t add millions of people to a program and say that it will pay for itself by reduced expenses of the program. And you can’t make people healthier by increasing the amount they have to spend on mandatory expenses, such that they can’t spend anything on themselves.

    But that’s exactly what this horrific program did. And then it did the unthinkable: It classified the premium payment as a tax.

    So now, a person can go to jail for not paying his taxes (insurance premiums), and guess what the person gets while in jail? Free health care! At the expense to the public!

    In truth (and this is not a criticism of the article; everybody does this), what people are paying is “medical payments insurance.” Health care is what one proactively does to protect themselves from incurring medical payments; it is not a substitute for medical payments. The only medical payments that should need to be protected against (insured for) are catastrophic injuries or diseases.

    By comparison, people don’t buy car insurance to pay for oil changes. But they buy health insurance (excuse me: medical payments insurance) to pay for routine medical check–ups.

  2. For as much as you continue the much is the same rhetoric, you offer no solutions in this long exposition. This is the cyclical nature of politics. All for me mentality. You must lose for me to win is what got us in this mess. How about this it what works. This is what’s not sustainable. Here are best case options. Let’s start discussions here. Labeling “Obamacare” or “Trumpcare” is not the branding that leads to any type of creative discourse. Alas, I always expect too much from small minded men with large wallets and an inability to think beyond what’s only good for corporate goons that padded their pockets via SuperPacs. Those who vote on these changes have no issue either way. They’re granted “healthcare for life”. How about we start there with our Repeal and Replace discussions?

    • Kelly Diamond says:

      Well we have plenty of examples of what works in relatively recent history. The problem isn’t that a viable solution to the healthcare issue has yet to be discovered. The problem is in waiting for politicians to get out of their own way. They are essentially using policy to line the pockets of their cronies. A more cynical examination might even conclude some “social engineering” motive.

      Honestly, I don’t think there is a political solution. I don’t think this is in the control of any individuals. This is truly a situation where people are left to either keep doing as they are told or mandated, OR opt out. Either opt out of health insurance, penalties be damned; or opt out of being in the US for more than 180 days per year.

      Not every fight can be won by engaging the attacker. Sometimes, a win means getting away with your life or your belongings.

      The most frustrating part in all this is that the Republicans DID run on the platform and promise of repealing Obamacare, and failed to pull through. So clearly, we aren’t voting our way out of it. And the current Republicans have made it clear that they likewise are NOT voting us out of it.

    • We offer solutions quite often. The problem is most people are too complacent to actually act on them.

Speak Your Mind

*

Read previous post:
Venezuela's Economic Collapse
Venezuela’s Continuing Economic Collapse

Venezuela's economic collapse is a series of examples of what NOT to do in central planning, if not an outright...

Close